Poaching is here to stay and how?
By Xavier Prabhu on Feb 29, 2008 in Indian PR industry
Past few weeks (prior to) and post the announcement of a new PR firm through a unique development, many an agency head across the country is having sleepless nights. Backed by really deep pockets, both the head honchos at the new firm and couple of head hunters are doing the rounds actively targeting select individuals and interviewing hundreds of candidates across the country. The tearing hurry to put in place a team before the formal launch date is sending the offered numbers to new heights making it irresistible.
Few years back, the market was in a similar tizzy when a new agency was born riding on the back of one of India’s largest business groups. There was palpable excitement, sharing notes on who got offers and what they got? etc. before it ebbed down and it was business as usual.
This kind of targeted and mass head hunting though new to PR industry is here to stay:
- unlike before the industry is heading in new directions and while it took agencies 10-12 years to establish, some of the entities born through such unique developments have taken radically less time to scale and one of the core elements of that business strategy is mass and targeted head hunting mixed with exponential spikes in remuneration
- while the going might be good for those jumping to the new ship, it remains to be seen whether they were able to sustain that growth moving forward over their other agency counterparts or after a year or two it was all back to the same square peg as everyone
- there is also the added risk if one is not capable and just rode the wave, of not being able to find the right offer post the honeymoon at the new entity is over since the price tag is not at all enticing from the point of view of potential employers
The broader question of whether this is healthy for an industry which already has a deep talent issue remains unanswered. Another factor that is conveniently overlooked is that combined with the exodus to corporate communication by those experienced any large scale poaching actually is bleeding agencies of the necessary middle management to deliver what they promise.
In essence, this is a vicious cycle which hurts both sides. Agencies for their part adopt convenient postures. Doing it if the situation demanded it and crying wolf if the boot was on their side. Leading to certain cynicism which am sure is fast spreading.
Moving around to discover one’s true market value or getting the best job fit is a done practice across sectors. And it is the right of each employee. But if it is catalyzed primarily by external factors and money, is it fine? Do share your views. If you would like to do it confidently please feel free to mail prspeak@gmail.com.
Popularity: 4% [?]




On Mar 3, 2008, Shael Sharma said:
Clearly a demand and supply sort of situation, moving to a new equilibrium isn’t it? What goes up comes down round and round. If people can move, they will move is the premise in these things. What can help Retention management?
1. Continuous monitoring of attrition rates
2. Highly competitive compensation
3. Personalised career plans
4. Senior management attention
5. Flexible working arrangements
6. Diversity programmes designed to develop, retain and promote diverse talent
Good luck all!
On Mar 3, 2008, Xavier Prabhu said:
thanks Shael. can we also debate other facets and implications of this as well since none seems to be consciously working on addressing the root cause of the demand supply gap.
the next is lack of tangible/objective means of value capturing so professionals can be paid better and what they deserve. even this cannot be one company’s attempt. other industries have done sharing of practices to get better across but alas we dont seem to be.
let me hear more and diverse views from both professionals and agency heads as well